Near the end of the article "Made Not Only in Words", Yancey addresses Leu's three sources of deixis in technological literacy:
1. transformations of literacy because of technological change,
2. the use of increasingly efficient technologies of communication that rapidly spread new literacies, and
3. envisionments of new literacy potentials within new technologies.
Source three is illustrated with an example: someone wishes to send an e-mail, but decides to compose it in a word processor. The article makes a point of mentioning that this is an "unexpected" use of a word processor, and earlier in the article Yancey cites Leu, who defines envisionment as using technology for purposes "at odds" with its original intention.
This seems to imply an overly-narrow definition of various technologies. The word processor in question might suggest by its name that it is for "processing words," but its feature set is far more complex than the rather bland label would have us believe. It is fair to say that composing an e-mail from within a word processor was "unexpected," but less fair to declare such a use "at odds" with a word processor designer's intentions.
I agree, however, with the idea that the advent of the Internet and the wider "digital age" allows for this third source of deixis to be practiced at levels heretofore unknown. The number of technologies that exploded onto the scene in recent decades has allowed for unprecedented user-generated creativity and user-defined evolution.
Print len(python) from datetime import datetime
9 years ago